I like the eff, but they're being disingenuous here. A "platform" is the common name for a provider of an "interactive computer service" which is in fact contr

I like the eff, but they're being disingenuous here. A "platform" is the common name for a provider of an "interactive computer service" which is in fact contrasted with being a publisher. Which isn't just a label you can accept or not, but a thing that you either are or aren't based on what you do. The objection that they're pretending isn't valid, is that excessive editorial control sure looks like it violates the spirit of that distinction.