Do you really honestly believe that anyone that became addicted really listened intently to Purdue Company marketing and made an informed decision based on that

Do you really honestly believe that anyone that became addicted really listened intently to Purdue Company marketing and made an informed decision based on that? That if the marketing was more cautious, they would have made a rational decision not use Oxycontin instead? Because I, to put it politely, don't think that's really how human behavior works. I mean, we have 500+ years of human history where people have become addicted to hard drugs without a marketing campaign. Including many in that same heroin/opium/morphine family. Maybe Occam's Razor is that people would've done the oxys regardless of what the Sacklers disclosed about the chemical compound....?