4 ms·
> AI has occasionally (rarely?) shown great success in solving problems without needing domain experts. See AlphaGo. Games are always orders of magnitudes easi
by xvilka 5y ago
> AI has occasionally (rarely?) shown great success in solving problems without needing domain experts. See AlphaGo.
Games are always orders of magnitudes easier then analyzing reality. They are highly constrained to the narrow domain and space of possibilities. Reality doesn't. There is work on understanding physical laws by the AI but it's very long path and they are much less successful than their artificial reality colleagues.
- sdenton4 5y agoIn just a few decades we've gone from 'chess is ai complete' to 'go is ai complete?' to 'games are too easy to be meaningful.' In game domains we have the ability to generate infinite meaningful training data and have easily measured outcomes. Waymo is generating near infinite data for driving, and doing quite well with it. In medicine, we have piddly ass datasets because of privacy concerns. 'Reality is hard' had nothing to do with it.
- danielmarkbruce 5y agoReality is hard is still a thing. Google has the ability to spends billions (or 10's) on something like Waymo and they still have to spend billions (or 10's) more to properly commercialize it. This isn't going to be a commonly done thing.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]