That's fair. If you follow the link, it's talking about Facebook reverting a temporary change that penalized "hyperpartisan" news sources. That's not quite the

That's fair. If you follow the link, it's talking about Facebook reverting a temporary change that penalized "hyperpartisan" news sources. That's not quite the same as FB deciding "what is factual"; it's FB deciding what news outlets are "hyperpartisan". It's still on the same slippery slope, but it seems like the cost:benefit ratio is far better, if you keep in mind the status quo -- regardless of which side of the left/right divide you may be on, you'll probably agree that the people on the extremes are nuts. (Yes, you will have a different opinion of what is "extreme", but the hyperpartisan outlets are in a feedback loop that rewards greater extremism so there's a fairly stark separation between left/right-leaning and the extremes.)