Well it says “after” the article, not “because of,” so it’s possible the FAA was planning to do this anyway. It’s even possible that the causality goes the oth

Well it says “after” the article, not “because of,” so it’s possible the FAA was planning to do this anyway. It’s even possible that the causality goes the other way: that the FAA’s movement toward a grounding was the spur for sources to reach out to a reporter.