4 ms·
Either you are twisting my words, or I phrased what I said very badly. Let me rephrase what I said, hopefully more clearly: First, from the perspective of "the
by krylon 5y ago
Either you are twisting my words, or I phrased what I said very badly. Let me rephrase what I said, hopefully more clearly:
First, from the perspective of "the universe", the very concept of meaning is meaningless (sorry, no pun intended). From THAT perspective, Stalin or Pol Pot or Hitler or Djenghis Khan killing millions of people is no more or less meaningful or morally good or bad than the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs.
But you and I are not "the universe". Nor is any other human being. To us, it DOES matter, a lot, what choices Stalin, Djenghis Khan or Napoleon make. As well as the choices you and I make, every minute of every day.
From a cosmological perspective, life is quite likely nothing more than a chemical curiosity. From our perspective, it is pretty much everything. The sun doesn't care if you are happy or sad or angry or scared. It cannot care (at least as far as we know). I can. So can anyone else who is reading this.
Ethics, I am trying to say, does not exist outside ourselves the way gravity or time does. But to us, it is just as real, maybe even more real, than any force of nature. This is what makes us human.
- NateEag 5y agoThank you for trying to clarify your thoughts. I understand that you think ethics exist inside human minds and not anywhere else. I still don't see why Stalin, Pol Pot, and company don't get to decide that they value mass murder to achieve their personal goals, in absentia transcendence. I find their choices appalling, but it seems they did not. It's the meaning they chose to make in their life. If that's their code of ethics, and those ethics exist solely inside our heads, then there's nothing to be said beyond "I hate that," as far as I can see.