> Oh no, that could be the conclusion. I mean, the job certainly could be impossible, but those studies don't prove it. As it relates to the discussion at hand

> Oh no, that could be the conclusion. I mean, the job certainly could be impossible, but those studies don't prove it. As it relates to the discussion at hand we know that we can do better at evaluating mammography because humans do it. Maybe I am not understanding what you are saying?