5 ms·
What's up with figure 4A having the human results at 100% sensitivity, 0% false positive rate? What is this trying to imply?
by spywaregorilla 5y ago
What's up with figure 4A having the human results at 100% sensitivity, 0% false positive rate? What is this trying to imply?
- cratermoon 5y agoThat they compared the results with an independent test (in this case, biopsies) that isn't subject to the same statistical errors?
- spywaregorilla 5y agoIs that it? I don't think so. That wouldn't make any sense. It seems to me it's trying to suggest the radiologists had 100% prediction accuracy. But that can't possibly be true.