Nothing surprising here for me to be honest. Data is almost always misrepresented, even in AI research. I haven't seen many papers showing the full distributio

Nothing surprising here for me to be honest. Data is almost always misrepresented, even in AI research. I haven't seen many papers showing the full distribution of result measures, only showing statistics about those measures, which can be disguising what's really going on (also made worse by implications of distributions which are not correct). My AI days have been over for a few years now since I finished my masters, but until then I *never* could reproduce anything published in papers, even using official packages. Data selection bias was (is?) a real problem.