Sure, the article does that, but not Spring themselves. Spring responds to the product creator that it's not their fault, it's Affinity's fault for trademark en

Sure, the article does that, but not Spring themselves. Spring responds to the product creator that it's not their fault, it's Affinity's fault for trademark enforcement. But the reality is that it's not Affinity's enforcement that's the issue. So yes, the article does a good job of getting to the heart of it, but for everyone who can get the attention of the press for their cause, how many are stuck with Spring's nonsense answer and attempt to shift blame?