3 ms·
> This makes it seem that Affinity is the prosecuting party, It was pretty clear to me that Affinity wasn't. I thought the article was quite notable for NOT p
by dnautics 5y ago
> This makes it seem that Affinity is the prosecuting party,
It was pretty clear to me that Affinity wasn't. I thought the article was quite notable for NOT painting Affinity as the "bad" party.
- rexreed 5y agoSure, the article does that, but not Spring themselves. Spring responds to the product creator that it's not their fault, it's Affinity's fault for trademark enforcement. But the reality is that it's not Affinity's enforcement that's the issue. So yes, the article does a good job of getting to the heart of it, but for everyone who can get the attention of the press for their cause, how many are stuck with Spring's nonsense answer and attempt to shift blame?
- dnautics 5y agook, sure. the referent for "This" in your parent comment is unclear. Thank you for clarifying, I agree with you!