5 ms·
First amateur polywell fusion reactor, in a Brooklyn apt
- rubyrescue 15y agowhat are the implications of this?
- MrMan 15y agofusion funds, energyscript, claims that lisp is better than fusion.
- MrMan 15y agoschemaless fusion, lots of advice about "how I got fusion." "Top 10 reasons your fusion is not reaching customers."
- mkelly 15y agoAww, HN takes itself so seriously...
- svrocks 15y agowell of course, they're changing the world one daily deal at a time. what has nuclear engineering ever done for society?
- sliverstorm 15y agoCertainly not as much as Groupon
- sukuriant 15y agoyou forgot your </sarcasm>
- DavidSJ 15y agoWe just don't want it to turn into reddit.
- polynomial 15y agoCannot upvote enough.
- awakeasleep 15y agoThat part of HN is already worse than Reddit, though.
- knieveltech 15y agoYeah, injecting a little humor into the discussion around here would really ruin the place. Edited to add: may you dour bastards choke on something.
- mkelly 15y agoThis made my day, thanks. :)
- jokermatt999 15y agoMy thoughts on it: you can find humor anywhere on the internet. It's much harder to find decent discussion. When humor and decent discussion try to coexist, humor tends to crowd out the discussion. Why bother posting detailed information about what kind of reaction is going on when you can make a simple joke about nuclear power and get as much karma? Why bother posting something intelligent when it will be buried below puns? I used to think HN downvoting humor was bad, but I've really come to agree with it after looking at some attempts at serious discussion on reddit. Without fail, by the third comment or so, someone will derail it with a predictable joke or pun. Humor is easy. Interesting comments are not.
- MrMan 15y agofusion on rails. VCs telling 22 year-olds that they are changing the world - one electron at a time.
- hugh3 15y agoNone. It's just a cool amateur electronics project. Energy in >> energy out. In fact, I'm assuming and hoping for the sake of his neighbours that he's not actually attempting fusion. If I recall correctly, doing actual fusion with one of these requires deuterium and tritium and produces a crapload of neutrons for which I really doubt he has adequate shielding. I'm pretty sure the experiment which he's attempting to replicate was never done with deuterium-tritium either, for similar reasons.
- sp332 15y agoI'm not sure about this one, but I know polywell reactors can be hot enough to use deuterium-deuterium reactions. It's cheaper, easier to extract energy from, and leaves stable helium nuclei with no stray neutrons.
- sbierwagen 15y agoNope. D-D fusion produces a 2.54 MeV neutron 50% of the time.
- sbierwagen 15y agoIn fact, I'm assuming and hoping for the sake of his neighbours that he's not actually attempting fusion. If I recall correctly, doing actual fusion with one of these requires deuterium and tritium and produces a crapload of neutrons for which I really doubt he has adequate shielding. Yes and no. The very lowest-energy-threshold fusion reaction is deuterium-tritium, so must research tokamak reactors use that. The JET[1], ITER[2], et al. But tritium is both expensive and excitingly dangerous, (It's an alpha emitter, which is ordinarily harmless, since the alpha particles aren't energetic enough to penetrate skin; but it's a radioactive gas, not a solid, so you can inhale it and get all sorts of amusing cancers) so real amateurs prefer Deuterium-Deuterium fusion, and the kind of fusion reactor that that produce the higher energies needed to accomplish it, known as fusors[3]. D-D fusion does produce neutrons, you are correct. But the PF reactor is a pulsed device, with a tiny coil size: it doesn't make many neutrons, and it produces them for seconds at a time. This guy has been checked out by the NYFD, and they've signed off on the project. If it was a power reactor, neutron emission would be a problem, but it's not, so it ain't. 1: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_European_Torus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_European_Torus 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER 3: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- WordSkill 15y agoTo be remembered down through the ages as the Great Vaporization of Brooklyn, August 3rd, 2011.
- sbierwagen 15y agoNope. Fusion reactors are fundamentally different from fission reactors. You have to get a tenuous wisp of hydrogen (the reactor in this particular experiment was running at 10 mTorr, or 0.0013% atmospheric pressure) very, very hot, and keep it away from solid matter, which is millions of degrees of colder than the fuel plasma, and will suck all of the energy out of the reaction. You shut off the containment coils, and tremendously hot plasma ions leap away from each other, instantly stopping the reaction. If the reaction somehow "runs away", which it absolutely can't, then it brushes the walls of the vacuum chamber, poisoning it with cold metal ions, like injecting lead shavings that have been chilled to absolute zero directly into your heart. If our magical "runaway reaction" somehow overcomes this, and melts a hole in the vacuum chamber, then the atmosphere rushes in, both freezing cold and at intolerably high pressure, like the North Sea flooding into the hull of a submarine resting on the ocean floor. Fusion reactors don't melt down, or explode. At all. It just can't happen, much like how a Yugo rear-ending a garbage truck in Brooklyn doesn't instantly consume all of New York City in a gasoline fireball. It is indicative of the great difficulty of both starting and sustaining a fusion reaction that the only fusion reactions which produced more energy than they consumed, that have ever taken place on Earth were powered by atomic bombs, and still only ran for fractions of a second.
- sliverstorm 15y agoWay to inject lead shavings that have been chilled to absolute zero directly into the best joke I've heard today :)
- jcrites 15y agoIt's worth calling out that a cubic meter of the sun's fusion reaction generates about the same power as an active compost heap. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Core http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Core - the huge energy output is due to the huge volume
- endian 15y agoNitpick: It's not an apartment, it's a shared lab space near the Marcy Projects. I visited a while back and it was cool. Awesome work, Mark!
- sbierwagen 15y agoThere was no actual fusion reaction occurring in this test. He just confined electrons in an air plasma. No hydrogen was injected. And, of course, it didn't take place in an apartment.
- VladRussian 15y agowell, starting from 20-30KV the plasma may start radiating X-rays (bremsstrahlung).
- emeltzer 15y agoHaha, I interviewed this guy for a position a while ago and saw his reactor and workshop. It's totally boss but it wasn't in an apartment but rather in a huge warehouse workshop space.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]