> He's saying that you can't both say it's good if the government does it and bad if a tribe does it. Who says that though? Is it a straw man argument or is th

> He's saying that you can't both say it's good if the government does it and bad if a tribe does it. Who says that though? Is it a straw man argument or is there some real point to it? Is it bad when the government and the tribe does it, or good when they do it? > The tribe has just as much right (that is, might), as a "legitimate government".