> So if we're going to try to be consistent here, the transitive logic of finger-pointing at previous comments means you end up pointing at your own. Actually

> So if we're going to try to be consistent here, the transitive logic of finger-pointing at previous comments means you end up pointing at your own. Actually it doesn't, because I never claimed that _anyone's_ comment needed to be flagged or rebuked. That's quite the bald face lie. The transitive logic would be that I was saying everyone's response was genuine, including my own. I never flagged nor downvoted anyone's comment, nor communicated with anyone to do so nor advocated for it being done. I think you need to go back and read what I really said: The fact that this above comment I genuinely replied to was not flagged nor rebuked by yourself, yet my genuine and upvoted response was flagged and rebuked, tells me all I need to know about what you're "trying for." Please point out anywhere in my statement that said the above comment needed rebuked or flagged. I hope that your reading comprehension improves as a result of this interaction.