3 ms·
I think the better way to do this would be to throw a "JoltException" which you could catch in your program if you wanted to, like any other exception. It seem
by nickdunkman 15y ago
I think the better way to do this would be to throw a "JoltException" which you could catch in your program if you wanted to, like any other exception.
It seems like it'd be a huge mess to try to write code succeeding the loop which tries to handle the case where your loop code didn't complete like you expected it to.