4 ms·
Interesting take---not at all what I expected from the title. The notion seems to be to preserve competition rather than running from one side of the boat to th
by hsmyers 15y ago
Interesting take---not at all what I expected from the title. The notion seems to be to preserve competition rather than running from one side of the boat to the other. I'm not sure that 2 makes for sufficient competition, but it certainly beats one.
- r00fus 15y ago> I'm not sure that 2 makes for sufficient competition, but it certainly beats one. This is a very interesting point. Competition only benefits consumers when there is sufficient choice to subvert collusion. Given the examples of US politics, US car manufacturers and the like, I would surmise that this likely requires more than 3 relatively equal competitive actors to be meaningful.