4 ms·

Sorry about your loss. There is no acceptable punishment for a crime of this scale that doesn't adequately deter future criminals. Billions in rewards isn't ju

Sorry about your loss. There is no acceptable punishment for a crime of this scale that doesn't adequately deter future criminals. Billions in rewards isn't just inadequate, it's disrespectful to every victim and their families.

2Xheadpalm 5y ago
No acceptable punishment, maybe not, however, fear can go a long way! Actual fear of _really_ losing all their family wealth, basically everything but the shirt on their back with a lifetime of hard labor to follow is probably a scarier proposition to these kind of scum then death is. On that note, hanging some of them from the rafters may also help deter this kind of parasitic behavior going forward.
- kuraudo 5y ago
  Why are we only talking about relieving them of their wealth? Why is capital punishment off the table?
rhizome 5y ago
>There is no acceptable punishment for a crime of this scale that doesn't adequately deter future criminals. Well this is just a self-justifying statement. "Acceptable," "adequately," so many ways to weasel out of assigning any consequences. Let's just discuss how adequate a hypothetical punishment will be in the future that we both definitely know facts about. >Billions in rewards isn't just inadequate, it's disrespectful to every victim and their families. Disrespectful to remedy the loss of one or more breadwinners? Disrespectful to prevent descendants from firing up the corporate grill again? I don't know what ethical standard you're using, but it seems to elevate suffering and misfortune. Disgorgement and prison, the facts bear this out. That they were able to buy their way out of this is more evidence that the nation strives to protect criminals who have money and are white.
- kaptainkarl--- 5y ago
  I'm 99% certain that you're outraged about a comment that you actually agree with.

4 ms·

Sorry about your loss. There is no acceptable punishment for a crime of this scale that doesn't adequately deter future criminals. Billions in rewards isn't ju

by BrianOnHN 5y ago

2Xheadpalm 5y ago
No acceptable punishment, maybe not, however, fear can go a long way! Actual fear of _really_ losing all their family wealth, basically everything but the shirt on their back with a lifetime of hard labor to follow is probably a scarier proposition to these kind of scum then death is. On that note, hanging some of them from the rafters may also help deter this kind of parasitic behavior going forward.
- kuraudo 5y ago
  Why are we only talking about relieving them of their wealth? Why is capital punishment off the table?
rhizome 5y ago
>There is no acceptable punishment for a crime of this scale that doesn't adequately deter future criminals. Well this is just a self-justifying statement. "Acceptable," "adequately," so many ways to weasel out of assigning any consequences. Let's just discuss how adequate a hypothetical punishment will be in the future that we both definitely know facts about. >Billions in rewards isn't just inadequate, it's disrespectful to every victim and their families. Disrespectful to remedy the loss of one or more breadwinners? Disrespectful to prevent descendants from firing up the corporate grill again? I don't know what ethical standard you're using, but it seems to elevate suffering and misfortune. Disgorgement and prison, the facts bear this out. That they were able to buy their way out of this is more evidence that the nation strives to protect criminals who have money and are white.
- kaptainkarl--- 5y ago
  I'm 99% certain that you're outraged about a comment that you actually agree with.