I think you're dismissing static site generators too quickly. An efficient static site generator will work very well for a lot of websites, because most of them

I think you're dismissing static site generators too quickly. An efficient static site generator will work very well for a lot of websites, because most of them aren't made up of >1,000 pages. Static sites are better for those who don't want to enable JavaScript or who would like to save a copy of the page to read later. I'm sure there are accessibility benefits with less complicated websites, too. Maybe I'm just strange, though. I log in directly to a TTY.