3 ms·
This is exactly the opposite of paternalistic government intervention. If the money can’t be put to productive use then the bank can’t profit from holding your
by Armisael16 5y ago
This is exactly the opposite of paternalistic government intervention. If the money can’t be put to productive use then the bank can’t profit from holding your money and they’d just as soon not have it. If you insist on giving it to them anyways they charge you for the privilege.