3 ms·
I think there was a Ben Eater video debunking the "PS/2 is faster than USB" myth. That used to be true, but the PS/2 is so much slower (lower frequency) that b
by Bigpet 5y ago
I think there was a Ben Eater video debunking the "PS/2 is faster than USB" myth.
That used to be true, but the PS/2 is so much slower (lower frequency) that by the time a package containing the mouse or keyboard info is finished transmitting the usb port started and finished a poll
- bear8642 5y agothink might be at end of this one <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aXbh9VUB3U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aXbh9VUB3U> though there's a few he's done recently on USB spec
- dmz73 5y agoUSB is faster and it is better when there is nothing saturating the USB with traffic and CPU can keep up. Most of the time there will be no noticeable difference using the USB mouse or PS/2 mouse. But if CPU is busy and USB bus is saturated, USB mouse will start to be less responsive than PS/2 mouse. In the extreme cases even USB keyboard will become unresponsive where the old PS/2 keyboard still works fine. This can make a difference between being able to terminate a misbehaving process and resume working or having to power-cycle the computer.
- DemocracyFTW 5y agoI frequently have this problem and I'm always aghast that no OS that I'm aware of has a good method to restrict resource usage to ensure the user can still perform essential tasks like terminate a problematic process. Instead, the machine just grinds to a halt and all you can do is sit and wait or else train your finger on the power switch.