3 ms·
It's not. My exchange with the author is at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27974055 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27974055 .
by eesmith 5y ago
It's not.
My exchange with the author is at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27974055 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27974055 .
- SirIsaac 5y agoThanks. I admit that my previous article was in error but this new article uses a different approach to the problem. It shows that the current equation was never meant to replace the previous one. Coriolis clearly wrote that he used vis viva = ½mv² for purposes of convenience. Edit: I'm grateful for our previous exchange. You pointed out new places and ideas that were useful to my research.