4 ms·
In the UK, BT (The biggest ISP) introduced CleanFeed[0] and "strongly encouraged" (read forced) to be used by the government. It was claimed that it would only
by benjiweber 15y ago
In the UK, BT (The biggest ISP) introduced CleanFeed[0] and "strongly encouraged" (read forced) to be used by the government. It was claimed that it would only ever be used for blocking child sexual abuse imagery.
Recently a judge has ruled that BT must use the same system to block a website used to share links. [1]
The list of blacklist sites itself can only be edited by a small group (iirc 4 people) of unelected and unaccountable people at the IWF[2]
Cleanfeed is also pretty flawed, doesn't work with HTTPS, can be interrogated to get a list of blocked content (using TTLs) and misleadingly returns 404 for blocked content.
[0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleanfeed_%28content_blocking_system%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleanfeed_%28content_blocking_s...
[1] http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/07/british-telecom-ordered-to-blacklist-usenet-search-engine.ars http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/07/british-tele...
[2] http://www.iwf.org.uk/ http://www.iwf.org.uk/
[3] http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf
- barrkel 15y agoNot only that, but it makes requests for non-blocked pages on the target server look like they're coming from a small group of proxies (I guess just one in practice). This plays havoc with other assumptions around load balancing and anti-abuse that don't assume entire countries are funneled through single proxies.
- pimeys 15y agoIn Finland the government encourages the ISP's to filter a list of sites. The list is secret and managed by the police to filter out child porn. One of the sites included in that list is a site which is criticizing the filtering. http://lapsiporno.info/english-2008-02-15.html http://lapsiporno.info/english-2008-02-15.html