3 ms·
Whether she realized it or not, she became the initial vector for distribution of child pornography the second she shared the photos online. So there is a semi-
by jonnathanson 15y ago
Whether she realized it or not, she became the initial vector for distribution of child pornography the second she shared the photos online. So there is a semi-reasonable argument to be made that she caused some degree of social harm in distributing the photos. I'm not sure which side of the fence I fall on, but at least I could entertain the argument with a straight face.
The exploitation charge, on the other hand, was patently ludicrous.
- JulianMorrison 15y agoThe social harm of distributing photos is that a minor was harmed. Jailing a minor is harm! What utter idiocy.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- bennysaurus 15y ago> So there is a semi-reasonable argument to be made that she caused some degree of social harm in distributing the photos. Entertaining that argument, the harm though would be to herself. Why should she be essentially doubly punished with membership to the sex offender's list and a criminal record?