4 ms·
Yup, it's still just mullvad.net with less privacy and a shadier corporate front. Chaining is doable using separate routing domains. Not for the faint of heart
by kristjank 5y ago
Yup, it's still just mullvad.net with less privacy and a shadier corporate front.
Chaining is doable using separate routing domains. Not for the faint of heart though.
- orf 5y agoI trust Mozilla way more than I trust Mullvad. And I’m a Mullvad customer.
- haswell 5y agoThis raises an interesting question: Is there any benefit to getting the Mozilla offering over the Mullvad offering?
- stjohnswarts 5y agoMozilla gets money? I mean if you like supporting mozilla.
- CameronNemo 5y agoLast I heard the Mozilla reskin is cheaper. And you support Mozilla (the foundation? Corporation? I can't tell).
- haswell 5y agoMozilla VPN starts at $9.99/month with month to month pricing. Mullvad is €5/month, period. Mozilla pricing starts to align once you pay 12 months at a time. At least on the surface, Mozilla isn’t providing a benefit to the consumer aside from an account / subscription management approach that is slightly more “normal”, and it’s unclear if that’s actually a good (or bad) thing.
- stjohnswarts 5y agoEh 90% of the "trust" lies on the wireguard server side and not the client side. Seems like a useless worry to me since mullvad controls that part.