3 ms·
Not OP, but I'd say, sure why not. Why does it have to be productive? It's arguably yet another paternalistic government intervention in the form of tweaking an
by zo1 5y ago
Not OP, but I'd say, sure why not. Why does it have to be productive? It's arguably yet another paternalistic government intervention in the form of tweaking and twiddling with economic and regulatory knobs.
- Armisael16 5y agoThis is exactly the opposite of paternalistic government intervention. If the money can’t be put to productive use then the bank can’t profit from holding your money and they’d just as soon not have it. If you insist on giving it to them anyways they charge you for the privilege.