I've spent way more time with Racket than Common Lisp (just picked it up over the last month) and Racket just doesn't have the same development experience as Co

I've spent way more time with Racket than Common Lisp (just picked it up over the last month) and Racket just doesn't have the same development experience as Common Lisp. There's no iterative / interactive development in Racket, by design [0]. That means you have to stop-and-reload-the-world every time you make a change. [0] https://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/the-drscheme-repl-isnt-the-one-in-emacs.html https://blog.racket-lang.org/2009/03/the-drscheme-repl-isnt-...