3 ms·
It still does what you want! This is an issue of syntax, not semantics. Avoiding unbounded lookahead is not "premature" optimisation - if introduced, it would
by johnday 5y ago
It still does what you want! This is an issue of syntax, not semantics.
Avoiding unbounded lookahead is not "premature" optimisation - if introduced, it would never be possible to remove due to the algorithmic complexity involved.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]