30 ms·
Nuclear is not ideal, because its civilizational brittle. Meaning it relies on complex society remaining stable and producing all those artifacts to maintain an
by OneTimePetes 5y ago
Nuclear is not ideal, because its civilizational brittle. Meaning it relies on complex society remaining stable and producing all those artifacts to maintain and recreate it. Add to that a complex supply chain and its less then ideal for a uncertain future.
- Reubachi 5y agoI can't think of any fuel source that will satisfy virtually all energy use cases with so little risk as nuclear batterization, even when considering the potential ability to lose the knowledge of how to maintain them given a total societal collapse. What other types of fuel are Armageddon proof? Certainly not coal, CNG, whale blubber, solar, etc......Fire maybe? Even then, might as well consider that the end of civilization regardless.......