3 ms·

That’s presuming that your definition of “useful” is more correct than the author’s definition, which strikes me as more than a bit odd.

• seba_dos1 5y ago
  That does not presume any definition of "useful", it's just a straight fact. It seems like you're trying to read between the lines when there's nothing there.
  • ashtonkem 5y ago
    I’m not trying to “read between the lines”, I’m saying that the author of a piece of software gets to decide what they consider to be the point and success criteria for their work, not you. If they don’t want their work being used commercially and that means you can’t use it, that’s a you problem and not a them problem.
    • seba_dos1 5y ago
      > I’m not trying to “read between the lines”, I’m saying that the author of a piece of software gets to decide what they consider to be the point and success criteria for their work, not you. Which is pretty much what I said as well, read more carefully.