4 ms·

So, if a company can't afford to enable "nast[iness]", they "should tank"? I am trying to take everyone's argument at face value, but yours doesn't make a lot o

by nickff 5y ago

So, if a company can't afford to enable "nast[iness]", they "should tank"? I am trying to take everyone's argument at face value, but yours doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

aaomidi 5y ago
The company should not prevent people discussing labor rights or labor organization. It's as simple as that.
- nickff 5y ago
  I think you’re ignoring the preceding comments in the thread.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]