ARM China isn't "going rogue"; it's doing what its owners want it to do, just like a good obedient non-rogue subsidiary should. The article not mentioning this

ARM China isn't "going rogue"; it's doing what its owners want it to do, just like a good obedient non-rogue subsidiary should. The article not mentioning this basic fact with a single word doesn't mean what's happening is weird; it means the article is bad. This isn't actually correct. The board voted to replace the CEO (7-1) but the CEO wouldn't give up the physical company seal (which is China represents the company), and he used that to gain control of the company. This is not conventional behaviour at all!!