3 ms·
The AAT is basically what’s known as an administrative court in other countries [1], or a consolidation of the numerous tribunals presided over by administrativ
by sjy 5y ago
The AAT is basically what’s known as an administrative court in other countries [1], or a consolidation of the numerous tribunals presided over by administrative law judges in the U.S. [2]. The average person in Australia is most likely to interact with the AAT by appealing a decision of the federal government in relation to child support, workers’ compensation, social security, immigration or tax [3]. Although the distinction between an AAT member and a judge is constitutionally important, it is not that obvious or practically significant. Both conduct public hearings and provide written reasons for deciding the legal disputes within their jurisdiction, which can be further appealed.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_court https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_court
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law_judge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_law_judge
[3] https://www.aat.gov.au/about-the-aat https://www.aat.gov.au/about-the-aat
- peytoncasper 5y agoReally appreciate the detailed answer @sjy! That makes sense, so it seems odd to me that this article is claiming this is effectively "warrantless". Functionally, it sounds like law enforcement still have to present their case to a judge and then there is a path for recourse on behalf of the citizen.