3 ms·
I think GP must be referring to Scalia's vote in Salinas v. Texas, which decided that a defendant's silence can be used against them at trial unless they specif
by cryptonector 5y ago
I think GP must be referring to Scalia's vote in Salinas v. Texas, which decided that a defendant's silence can be used against them at trial unless they specifically invoked their 5th amendment right to be quiet.
- maerF0x0 5y agoMost directly I am referring to Duane's advice, of which I do not know his direct source (but I'm sure it's in the book as there are extensive notes). Just thought I'd help clarify where I was coming from. That trial does seem to fit the scenario though.