3 ms·
I think you missed the point. By this logic, the top 51% have more influence than the bottom 49% so why isn't GP saying they're the ones driving democracy? As
by AlexandrB 5y ago
I think you missed the point. By this logic, the top 51% have more influence than the bottom 49% so why isn't GP saying they're the ones driving democracy?
As an aside, if you look at the elected representatives of Australia, I suspect you'll find most of them are highly educated.
- hazza_n_dazza 5y agoor you might not. some of the highest ministers are country bumpkins catering to the lowest common denominator. the country was however founded by very well educated persons.