You implied the corruption was inevitable. Either the endowment fund is corrupt already, or your assertion about 'inevitable' is meaningless. History is filled

You implied the corruption was inevitable. Either the endowment fund is corrupt already, or your assertion about 'inevitable' is meaningless. History is filled with lots of examples of corruption. Including in free markets. You were referring to the existence of a years-long waiting list, as if it were a meaningful evidence they should raise rents in order to avoid the artificial scarcity you think is universally bad. Who do you think they should kick out, and why?