4 ms·
It is worth remembering that we are barely 100 years from the time in which the notion of galaxies was not common. The textbook itself discusses Nebulae near th
by a9h74j 5y ago
It is worth remembering that we are barely 100 years from the time in which the notion of galaxies was not common. The textbook itself discusses Nebulae near the end, in all of 2--3 pages.[1]
From p. 199: It was consequently thought, at once, that all nebulae might be shown to be star clusters under sufficiently high powers of the telescope. But the spectrascope has shown that such an inference is untenable, as the spectra of the two things are quite different, and that the spectrum of a nebula contains a line which is found nowhere else, and which is attributed to some substance called nebulum, and which is totally unknown anywhere except in a nebula.
I propose we adopt neo-nebulum as a more neutral term than dark matter!!
[1] https://archive.org/details/cu31924031322203/page/n213/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/cu31924031322203/page/n213/mode/...
- handrous 5y agoWhat ended up being the cause of that mysterious spectral line?
- ericbarrett 5y agoDouble-ionized oxygen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebulium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebulium
- handrous 5y agoHa! Didn't occur to me to search the archaic name on Wikipedia, but in hindsight, of course that works.
- Trombone12 5y agoOther 1910 astronomy questions: how do star work? How are they powered? Do they just cool forever from their birth? Do they contract to the point of becoming liquid?