3 ms·
A long time ago, there was a startup called Digital Island. They were a small(er) exchange (or is the term "market maker"?), but they handled about 20% of NASDA
by ajays 15y ago
A long time ago, there was a startup called Digital Island. They were a small(er) exchange (or is the term "market maker"?), but they handled about 20% of NASDAQ's daily volume.
The good thing was, they would let you buy their data post-facto (not realtime). At the end of the day, you could download their entire set of completed orders for the day. The cost was minimal ($30/month, IIRC).
But they were bought out by NASDAQ, and NASDAQ shut down this data-sharing program. Which, to me, reinforces the point that the powers-that-be don't want to lose control of the information; it's a pay-to-play system, and information is one of the privileges to paying the big bucks.
One would assume that being a heavily regulated system, it would be expected that all orders would be open to the public (at least the historical ones), to ensure transparency. But one would be mistaken.....
- snikolic 15y ago> "powers-that-be don't want to lose control of the information" This. What happens when they inevitably do?
- beagle3 15y agoThey won't. To lose control of the information, the way it is _generated_ must become decentralized. While this may happen (e.g., it does in foreign exchange markets to some extent), it will not be _this_ kind of information, but something completely different.