2 ms·
My first thought was "this probably wouldn't work for games, and other uses of embedded 3D content are pretty niche" But then I thought, maybe they're niche be
by brundolf 5y ago
My first thought was "this probably wouldn't work for games, and other uses of embedded 3D content are pretty niche"
But then I thought, maybe they're niche because something like this doesn't already exist
- pphysch 5y ago3D is a poor choice for many visualizations because when it is rendered in 2D, information is hidden behind the model being transformed over time (either manually by the user or via automatic rotation, etc). IMO it should only be considered if there are challenges with flattening the data in question. For example, if the data represents an actual scanned 3D object. On the other hand, rendering arbitrary data as "3D" models is usually a cute waste of time. There are much more effective ways to explore and analyze it.