3 ms·
My main gripe is that, according to some of the comments, a Microsoft account will be required, at least for the home version. It might seem like nitpicking, an
by Delk 5y ago
My main gripe is that, according to some of the comments, a Microsoft account will be required, at least for the home version. It might seem like nitpicking, and perhaps many people wouldn't consider it a major hurdle, but if I'm paying for an OS, I like the idea of it being a product and not a service, especially if it's paid for as a product. Tying logins more strongly to online accounts also sounds bad from a privacy perspective, and I'd like any online services to be there only if I need them, not pushed to me as a necessity.
Essentially, I want the core software on my computer to just provide a working environment for me and my applications. I don't want it to be an entire online system of services the vendor wants me to want. Helpful additional services are nice, but none of it should be required for a product to work.
I'm also not fond of the idea of having to explain to my elderly parents why they need to register for yet another online account with yet another litany of terms and conditions just in order to use their computer.
- JohnFen 5y ago> My main gripe is that, according to some of the comments, a Microsoft account will be required While I don't use Windows at home, if I did, this would be a complete dealkiller.
- Delk 5y agoI was Linux-only at home (and, incidentally, also for work) for years but decided to keep the Windows install that came on my current laptop because I started gaming a bit more again. I don't know if logging in will still be possible without phoning home and automatically logging in to various MS services every time, but if it's not or if MS just keeps turning Windows further into an online service (and the customer into a product), it'll probably be time to go Windows-less again.
- r1chardnl 5y agoMaybe run Windows in a VM with your GPU passed through.