4 ms·
Though I take your point, poster design doesn't allow (or aim for) a huge amount of nuance. And I'd guess that Apple was likely chosen as the "tracks you" beca
by mandmandam 5y ago
Though I take your point, poster design doesn't allow (or aim for) a huge amount of nuance.
And I'd guess that Apple was likely chosen as the "tracks you" because they push their privacy angle, despite not quite living up to it. It makes sense in that way to target them - if they're widely considered as better than alternatives, what does that say about the alternatives?
- danpalmer 5y agoAs I said, I'm not sure of a solution to the nuance, but I do think each of these is a little irresponsible in its own way. To use the Apple example – you're right they don't quite live up to their privacy marketing (because it's marketing!), but if we teach people that Apple are bad at privacy the answer is that they won't value the privacy angle and will buy cheap Huawei phones, which is about the worst possible outcome. The reality is that Apple are ~90% good at privacy, and most people can probably trust them more than anyone else on the market.