4 ms·
Overall if they want to charge for their product that's fine. I just hate the model of release free or really permissible application, wait for widespread adopt
by kcb 5y ago
Overall if they want to charge for their product that's fine. I just hate the model of release free or really permissible application, wait for widespread adoption, then tighten clamp. For what it's worth they've lost my business there.
- codyogden 5y agoI want to coin it as “embrace, extend, extort.”
- cyral 5y agoVery accurate for a lot of companies like this lately. Consider it coined.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 5y agoNah, newer generations rediscovering the concept of shareware and trial/demo versions.
- benbristow 5y agoSame with Telerik Fiddler recently. Good piece of software for debugging network requests on Windows. Was free for as long as I've known it existed. Telerik recently bought by 'Progress' (ironic), software re-written in Electron and now charges a subscription to use it. Glad HTTP Toolkit is now available free for 'hobbyist' tasks - https://httptoolkit.tech/ https://httptoolkit.tech/
- pimterry 5y agoI'm the author of HTTP Toolkit! Just ran into this by chance, glad you like it :-D I should mention here: not only is the core product all free, it's also completely open source, even including the paid bits (https://github.com/httptoolkit https://github.com/httptoolkit). And those Pro features are completely free for all contributors to the project. I've tried to set it up so I couldn't run off with it and force everybody to start paying even if I wanted to, but any suggestions for further improvements there very welcome.
- stavros 5y agoI love you.
- benbristow 5y agoWhat a coincidence. It's a really nice bit of software. Thanks for creating it! I was very, very impressed when I opened the Android mode and my Genymotion emulator just opened automatically with the VPN app and connected.
- radus 5y agoWow great rec!
- canti 5y agoThank you for the recommendation! I've been looking for a good Fiddler alternative, I'll have to check this out.
- sebazzz 5y ago
- eikenberry 5y agoDocker desktop was never really free, as in free software, was it? If so, then it was always a proprietary app and they were always in control. IE. the clamp was always tight.
- chrisseaton 5y agoIt was free of charge.
- eikenberry 5y agoWhich is why being free of charge isn't really the point of free software.
- chrisseaton 5y agoBut not everyone cares about 'libre' software, or thinks the simple descriptive term 'free' should be co-opted in discussions like you are.
- pjmlp 5y agoIt used to be called shareware.
- TeeMassive 5y agoI often get laughed at when I say we should backup every tools/repositories/packages through a proxy and use only that in our internal processes. I also get scolded at making use our Dockerfiles only calls scripts a developer can use on his own machine or any other container manager once the "too good to be free" tech of the decade goes full Oracle on us. Then everyone panics when a critical build stops working because some apt repository of some decades old distros is unplugged or some shell script piped directly to bash goes dark (or someone with a bit of security common sense rightfully has a panic attack) and we have to salvage it using some ex-employees backup images. This is also why I just don't say I do devops because it just gets to a point where the "devops guys" are just the people you give the dirty jobs nobody wanna do.