7 ms·
> It is unclear how many shares Judge Conley possessed during the case, but ownership of company stock in any capacity would have required his recusal under the
by Nbox9 5y ago
> It is unclear how many shares Judge Conley possessed during the case, but ownership of company stock in any capacity would have required his recusal under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges.
The apple insider article.
- arcbyte 5y agoOnly if ownership of the stock was substantially affected by the outcome of the case. Which gets back to OP's point of needing to know more specifics of the judge's holdings.
- gruez 5y ago>but ownership of company stock in any capacity would have required his recusal under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges. So, most judges? I assume they tend to be high net worth individuals, so it's very likely they own APPL in some capacity in their stock portfolios and/or retirement funds.