3 ms·
That's rather rich coming from a magazine (like all of them really) that has so decidedly chosen a team for the culture wars. I can't say that it's a matter of
by OneEyedRobot 5y ago
That's rather rich coming from a magazine (like all of them really) that has so decidedly chosen a team for the culture wars.
I can't say that it's a matter of 'democracy' but simply human nature on the large scale. Personal and mass behavior (personal in the aggregate I guess) is going to be steered by a combination of top-down force and bottom-up culture. Diversity implies a lack of bottom-up control systems so, if anything, you need less democracy in modern states.
Obviously social media makes it easier to gin up a mob, and there's always been the truth that small yet loud contingents can punch above their weight, but it seems to me that there's nothing really new here. Social media appears to allow impolite behavior at lower cost, but that poor behavior was always built into the individual.
Perhaps what I'd like to hear is some insight from a participant in the Yugoslavia breakup.
- JohnWhigham 5y agoThe Atlantic is actually much better than, say, Mother Jones/Slate/Salon. Back in 2015, they ran "Coddling of the American Mind" which was one of the first big articles detailing this shift in public discourse.
- ceilingcorner 5y agoThat’s kind of how the media works. Invent problems, harp on them for weeks, then either move on or offer your own new “commentary” about solutions. All while making big bucks off the advertising eyeballs.