4 ms·
I don’t use adblocking because if a site is so revolting that it requires adblocking to make it usable, I just don’t visit the site at all. I used to use adblo
by massysett 5y ago
I don’t use adblocking because if a site is so revolting that it requires adblocking to make it usable, I just don’t visit the site at all.
I used to use adblocking but the tiny site Distrowatch made an impression on me. The owner rigged something so that those using adblock also would not see non-ad images. He said it’s really not fair to visit a free site and then block the thing that allows it to be free.
Also, I then read that one of the adblockers would take payments from advertisers to unblock their ads. What a racket.
So I block no ads. This does mean that I don’t look at the vast bulk of news sites because they have obnoxious ads. However, most decent news sites are now pay walled, and those that aren’t are junk anyway. I get my news from some sites I pay for, and from non-profit email newsletters, and from sites my employer pays for. These have few ads.
So I have found no loss from not using adblock. Adblock is like putting on a bulletproof vest to walk through a warzone. Better to just keep out of warzones.
- Moru 5y agoAdblock is like having a bodyguard running ahead of you, making sure the neighbourhood is still safe to walk, just in case someone shady moved in. Added bonus is he drags you along on a rope so you can move faster and bring more groceries from the store. Adblock makes my slow computer and phone bareable to use on "modern" homepages. Without them the load times multiplies.
- mywittyname 5y agoMy phone isn't even slow and ad blockers are required for most sites to be usable.