>and its present meaning is related to the OSI Not unless you work for the OSI, least you forget they actually tried to get it patented and got rejected: https

>and its present meaning is related to the OSI Not unless you work for the OSI, least you forget they actually tried to get it patented and got rejected: https://opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.php https://opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.p... I'm happy for OSI proponents to use the legally approved version of licenses that support their ideology as OSI approved licenses. I will keep using open source to means software where the source code is open, as has been the case since the 80s and 90s, the latter of which I was around to use before OSI popped up and tried to privatize language for their own benefit.