You think it’s okay for ISPs to double dip on charging their customers for access and then charging their customers’ most popular services (who are frequently c

You think it’s okay for ISPs to double dip on charging their customers for access and then charging their customers’ most popular services (who are frequently competitors of the ISPs) for the privilege of accessing their customers? Why should any ISP think they can charge the source of my bits when I am already paying them for the bandwidth? https://www.theversed.com/2754/riot-games-seek-court-justice-after-internet-provider-deliberately-causes-in-game-lag/#.IfBauVI0Ad https://www.theversed.com/2754/riot-games-seek-court-justice... Net Neutrality is not just about “shoveling YouTube streams without having to pay.” In one case, an ISP was deliberately dropping packets for a popular online game (which, if you didn’t know, online games are known for requiring very little bandwidth), and extorting the game developer with the loss of ISP’s customers if they did not pay up. ISPs are monopoly-abusing extortionists. They deserve every bit of ire they receive.