But even with this definition: >Copyright law today grants software developers that power, so they and only they choose the rules to impose on everyone else—a

But even with this definition: >Copyright law today grants software developers that power, so they and only they choose the rules to impose on everyone else—a relatively small number of people make the basic software decisions for all users, typically by denying their freedom. When users lack the freedoms that define free software, they can't tell what the software is doing, can't check for back doors, can't monitor possible viruses and worms, can't find out what personal information is being reported (or stop the reports, even if they do find out). If it breaks, they can't fix it; they have to wait for the developer to exercise its power to do so. If it simply isn't quite what they need, they are stuck with it. They can't help each other improve it. A non-commercial license still covers all of these "freedoms." The only caveat is that you can't sell it or derivatives thereof.