3 ms·
I'm not convinced. Solar is cheaper than nuclear and making Methane can be done when production exceeds demand. Why do you think that nuclear would be better su
by adrianN 5y ago
I'm not convinced. Solar is cheaper than nuclear and making Methane can be done when production exceeds demand. Why do you think that nuclear would be better suited for the task?
- ClumsyPilot 5y agoIts cheaper, but you are converting it to methane and back to electricity at abyssimal 15% efficiency, and paying for all that extra conversion infrastructure, so your costs are like 10x.
- fulafel 5y agoBy the time your now started nuclear project is finished, renewable energy will be less than 1/10 the cost if current trends hold even remotely.