As required by Newsom’s executive order, the agency said it paid particular attention to equity — focusing on areas with high “poverty levels, residents with di

As required by Newsom’s executive order, the agency said it paid particular attention to equity — focusing on areas with high “poverty levels, residents with disabilities, language barriers, residents over 65 or under five years of age, and households without a car.” Is the same “equity” philosophy guiding California’s responses to crime and homelessness? How does one apply this rubric to management of national forests in California? I don’t understand.