> Why would you think the governor of any state would seize those forests? Why would you come to that conclusion? He's a politician, I would assume he'd use

> Why would you think the governor of any state would seize those forests? Why would you come to that conclusion? He's a politician, I would assume he'd use _political_ pressure to get action. > Fires don't care about property lines. Precisely. If the land is being managed in a way that is raising risk and danger to surrounding land, why would you stand idly by and defer to Washington D.C?